How does dhs prevent terrorist attacks

Help prevent such attacks both at home and abroad. The pilot team members reached out across DHS and industry to conduct market research and establish a commercial baseline. They used their knowledge of international social media sites, media, and language processing to focus the review of open-source and social media analytic capabilities and technologies. Ultimately, the pilot team evaluated more than social media tools for their potential for addressing critical mission areas.

They highlighted solutions for accessing some 30 social media platforms on the Internet and darknets, using datasets in plus languages. They also discovered problems with existing analytic capabilities that were quickly improved for government agencies. Their work also helped components of DHS to improve their capabilities to fulfill their missions, achieve operational efficiencies, and lower costs through the automation of advanced analytics, thereby advancing our sponsor's overall goals. Our work in aviation security is another prime example.

The downing of a Russian passenger jet in over Egypt confirmed that security threats to commercial airliners are becoming more sophisticated. The Dynamic Aviation Risk Management System DARMS will integrate information from various threat vectors in real time and apply risk-based security algorithms for ongoing determination and assessment of the "risk profile" for each flight. DARMS will enable security officials to focus their security countermeasures on mitigating threats to high-risk flights while identifying the low-risk majority of flights as suitable for expedited screening of their passengers, baggage, and cargo.

Our anti-terrorism work requires close collaboration with numerous components of DHS. MITRE is proud to be an equal opportunity employer. But given the threats facing the nation, we felt that reform was necessary. As I said during the Senate floor debate on the legislation:. We have no choice. DHS has certainly had its problems over the last two decades, some small and others more serious, from jokes on late night television shows about the color-coded threat alert system, to the mismanaged response to Hurricane Katrina in , to operational challenges at the southwest border in recent years.

It has also faced ongoing challenges with employee morale and developing a united organizational culture across its operational elements, each of which brought its separate history to DHS.

It seems to me that has now happened. We now have a robust system of screening and vetting at our borders and airports that make it much more difficult for foreign terrorists and other illicit actors to travel to the U. We have eliminated information-sharing barriers that hindered key federal, state and local agencies from sharing information on potential threats. We have stronger disaster response capabilities today, both at a FEMA that was reformed after Hurricane Katrina and in our states and localities.

And DHS has greatly matured its role in cybersecurity over the past 15 years, leading to bipartisan congressional support for the creation of the Cybersecurity and Information Security Agency at DHS in In looking back on this two-decade record, it is absolutely clear that it was the right decision to create DHS.

Some have argued for dismantling DHS and scattering its component agencies back to other federal departments. That would be a terrible mistake that would undermine our security when threats to our homeland are growing in lethality and diversity. If DHS did not exist today, Congress would undoubtedly create it. More support is also needed at DHS to combat domestic terrorism threats, given the January 6 th attack on the U. The group declared war against the US and operates openly in parts of Pakistan despite a ban on its activities in Radical cleric Abu Bakar Bashir founded the group in July to establish a caliphate in Indonesia.

JAT leadership has publicly stated that violence is religiously permissible when directed against perceived enemies of Islam—specifically Indonesian judges, prosecutors, and police. JAT is implicated in a series of attacks conducted in JI was formed in the early s to establish an Islamic state in southern Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Brunei, and the southern Philippines.

The group conducted a series of lethal bombings targeting Western interests in Indonesia and the Philippines during , including attacks in against two nightclubs in Bali that killed people, including seven Americans. Kurdish separatist group KGK is composed of mostly Turkish Kurds who in began a campaign of armed violence, including terrorism, resulting in more than 45, deaths.

KGK has directed operatives to target security forces, government offices, and villagers who opposed it. LT is the military wing of the Pakistan-based Islamic fundamentalist missionary organization established in the s to oppose Soviets in Afghanistan.

The group is one of the largest and most proficient Kashmir-focused militant groups. The Indian Government charged LT with the attacks in Mumbai in , which killed more than people.

Unscheduled deliveries of materials or equipment. Unattended or unauthorized vessels or vehicles in unusual or restricted areas. Overt testing of security measures or emergency response. Hidden, disguised, or unusual storage of: » Laboratory equipment—Bunsen burners, lab stands, and scientific glassware. Terrorists can conduct secondary attacks by infiltrating suicide bombers into crowds of bystanders or by detonating preset bombs remotely through the use of timers, remote triggers, or motion sensors.

These explosive devices may be concealed in innocuous items of various sizes, such as vehicles, backpacks, garbage cans, mail boxes, and planters. Maintain awareness of possible remote initiation or backup timer on any improvised explosive device. Be used to conduct a secondary attack. Create more victims, including first responders already on scene.

Potentially affect response times and delay genuine emergency responders. Allow access for individuals to conduct surveillance or collect information. Multiple responses requiring specialized or technical equipment that reduces resources. A significant incident or several minor incidents that require a commitment of resources to investigate or mitigate.

Unusually high number of calls for service or incidence of activities inconsistent with typical patterns within the area of responsibility. Provide situational updates to first responders to enhance safety. Ensure regular notifications to interagency partners and neighboring jurisdictions to provide shared operational picture of possible diversionary attacks.